TLDR
Bloomerang has better analytics and email; Network for Good bundles coaching but costs more for what you get. Neither handles grants - plan on a separate tool if you run federal or foundation funding.
Best overall: GrantPipe
GrantPipe is the winner when the decision includes donor CRM, grant operations, restricted-fund visibility, and compliance reporting in one workflow.
| Feature | Bloomerang | Network for Good | GrantPipe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing posture | Starts at $125/month | Custom quote / package pricing | Starter $329/mo; Growth $539/mo; Audit-Ready $1,079/mo; custom Enterprise path |
| Setup profile | Self-serve onboarding plus optional services | Onboarding and coaching positioned as part of the offer | No setup fee |
| Grant workflow depth | Published grant tracking / grant management coverage, but not a compliance-first post-award system | Not grant-compliance centered | Application through post-award workflow |
| Compliance depth | Limited compared with purpose-built restricted-fund and audit workflow software | Not built around restricted-fund and post-award reporting rigor | Restricted-fund and reporting workflow built in |
The Core Difference in Positioning
Bloomerang is a donor CRM. Network for Good is a fundraising platform. That distinction shapes everything about how each product is designed and priced.
Bloomerang optimizes for donor relationship quality: retention rates, engagement scores, giving history, and communication tracking. It is the tool of choice for development staff who want to manage individual donor relationships with precision.
Network for Good optimizes for fundraising throughput: donation pages, event registration, peer-to-peer campaigns, and strategic coaching. It is designed for organizations that want a single vendor to handle the entire fundraising operation.
Pricing Structure
The pricing gap is substantial. At $125-$249/mo for Bloomerang versus $499-$799/mo for Network for Good, the difference is $4,000-$7,000/yr. Network for Good bundles coaching services into that price, which changes the calculation if your organization needs development strategy support. If you have experienced development staff who manage their own strategy, you are paying for services you do not use.
What Neither Platform Covers
Executive directors managing both individual donors and grant funding will find the same gap in both platforms: no grant management, no restricted fund compliance, no funder reporting workflows.
This is worth naming explicitly because the comparison can seem comprehensive - two polished nonprofit platforms with clear trade-offs - while missing a significant operational category. An organization that manages $500,000 in annual grant funding needs a compliance layer that neither Bloomerang nor Network for Good provides.
Making the Decision
The choice between Bloomerang and Network for Good typically comes down to two factors:
-
Budget: If $500/mo is sustainable and you want an broad fundraising platform, Network for Good’s bundle has value. If you are working within a tighter software budget, Bloomerang covers the core donor CRM use case more affordably.
-
Team capacity: Network for Good’s coaching model suits organizations with limited internal development expertise. Bloomerang suits organizations with capable development staff who want tools, not guidance.
For executive directors whose funding mix includes grants alongside individual donors, the more important evaluation is whether either platform adequately covers the full operational picture - including compliance.
The GrantPipe Alternative
Neither Bloomerang nor Network for Good was built for organizations that manage restricted grants alongside donor relationships. We built GrantPipe published self-serve pricing - no coaching bundle markup, no per-contact scaling. If your funding mix includes government or foundation grants with compliance requirements, the Bloomerang-vs-Network for Good comparison leaves out the capability that matters most.
How to decide between these two options
Bloomerang vs Network for Good: Which Nonprofit CRM Fits Your Organization? should be evaluated against the operating model of your team, not just a feature table. The first question is where complexity lives today. If the organization needs clean donor workflows with minimal setup, ease of use and deployment time matter more than theoretical customization. If the organization has complex approvals, long reporting cycles, and dedicated technical capacity, flexibility may justify the heavier setup burden.
A useful comparison frame is this: what does each platform require after purchase to become trustworthy for board packets, funder updates, and month-end reporting? Some tools look competitive until the team realizes every grant-related workflow still lives outside the system. Others offer broad customization but require paid administration before they become stable.
What to verify in the demo
Ask each vendor to walk through the same sequence: create a record, update a restricted or grant-related status, generate a leadership-ready report, and explain what happens when staff responsibilities change. That workflow exposes whether the product supports a repeatable process or only stores data. If the answer relies on exports, consultant-built objects, or manual spreadsheet reconciliation, the total cost and execution risk are higher than the headline comparison suggests.
Free resource
Get the Nonprofit CRM Evaluation Scorecard
A weighted scoring framework for comparing nonprofit CRMs across the 8 categories that matter most to mid-sized organizations: donor management, grant tracking, reporting, integrations, and total cost. Delivered by email.
Looking for something else?
| Feature | Bloomerang | Network for Good | GrantPipe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $125/mo | $499/mo | {{grantpipe.price.starterLaunch}} |
| Donor CRM | Full (retention-focused) | Full (bundled) | Full |
| Fundraising pages | Limited | Yes (built-in) | No |
| Peer-to-peer fundraising | No | Yes | No |
| Coaching included | No | Yes | No |
| Grant compliance | No | No | Yes |
| Restricted fund tracking | No | No | Yes |
| Setup fees | No | No | No |
PROS & CONS
Bloomerang
Pros
- Transparent, published pricing with no demo required to get a number for a budget proposal
- Donor retention analytics - lapse risk, engagement scoring, giving dashboards - are among the best in this price range
- No bundled coaching requirement means you pay only for the CRM, not services you may not use
Cons
- No grant management or compliance features at any tier
- Price scales with record count, so contact database growth increases the annual cost
PROS & CONS
Network for Good
Pros
- Bundled fundraising coaching included - useful for organizations without experienced internal development staff
- Digital fundraising tools including peer-to-peer pages, donation forms, and event registration are built in rather than add-ons
Cons
- No published pricing; a demo is required before any cost number is available
- No grant lifecycle management at any tier - restricted fund tracking and compliance reporting require a separate tool
- Transaction fees on processed donations may apply on top of the subscription cost and must be explicitly confirmed during the sales process
Q&A
What should an ED do if they need both donor CRM and grant compliance?
Bloomerang covers donor CRM well but has no grant features. Network for Good bundles fundraising tools and coaching but also lacks grant management. Organizations that need both donor management and grant compliance typically end up running two separate systems. GrantPipe published self-serve pricing with no setup fees, which avoids the cost and data fragmentation of maintaining separate tools.
Verdict
Network for Good is priced for organizations that want a broad fundraising platform with coaching included and have the budget to support it. Bloomerang is still useful for organizations that want a focused, high-quality donor CRM at a lower price and are comfortable sourcing their own fundraising strategy. Neither covers grant management - that gap applies to both. GrantPipe publishes self-serve pricing without the missing compliance layer.
GrantPipe pricing at a glance
Every plan includes a 1-month free trial, unlimited users, and access to the same source-of-truth feature catalog.
Starter
Stop losing track
Growth
Stay ahead of the work
Audit-Ready
Prove what happened
Need a custom path?
Larger or unusual grant operations can start with a founder conversation. Enterprise is not a fourth self-serve pricing card.
Frequently asked