Skip to main content

Moves Management for Major Gifts: A Working Framework

Published: Last updated: Reviewed: Sources: givingusa.org blackbaudinstitute.com philanthropy.iupui.edu

TLDR

Moves management is the discipline of tracking each major gift prospect through a defined set of stages — identification, qualification, cultivation, solicitation, stewardship — with a documented next move and date for every prospect. Done well, it converts vague relationship-building into a measurable pipeline. Done poorly, it becomes spreadsheet theater.

What Moves Management Is

Moves management is a system for tracking individual major gift prospects through defined stages, with a documented next action and date for every prospect at every stage. The “move” is any substantive interaction that advances the relationship — a discovery visit, a private tour, a strategy lunch, an ask meeting, a stewardship report. The goal is to make sure no prospect goes 90 days without one.

The framework dates to G.T. “Buck” Smith and was popularized by David Dunlop and others at large universities in the 1970s and 1980s. The core insight has held up: relationship fundraising at scale requires the same discipline as a sales pipeline, with stages, owners, and accountable cadence. Calling someone after 18 months of silence to ask for a six-figure gift is fundraising malpractice, and yet most underperforming programs do exactly that.

This guide assumes you have at least a partial major gift program in place. If you’re earlier than that, start with the major gift cultivation guide and the major donor qualification guide.

The Five Stages

Every moves management framework boils down to five stages. The names vary; the substance does not.

Identification

A prospect enters the system. Identification can come from several sources: wealth screening of the existing donor file, board referrals, peer screening sessions, foundation board overlap, news mentions, or self-identification through high-tier annual fund giving.

Identification is cheap. The output is a list. The work hasn’t started yet.

Qualification

The disciplined screen of whether this prospect is worth investing in. Three questions:

  • Capacity. Wealth screening, public records, real estate, business interests, prior giving — does the prospect plausibly have the capacity to make a meaningful gift?
  • Inclination. Is there reason to believe they care about the cause? Prior giving history, board service at peer organizations, public statements, foundation interests.
  • Access. Can someone in your network — staff, board, volunteer — credibly initiate a conversation? A high-capacity prospect with no access path is not actually qualified.

Qualification typically requires both desk research (the donor wealth screening guide covers this) and at least one discovery visit. The output is a yes/no/defer decision and, if yes, a tentative gift range.

Cultivation

The longest stage. Months to years of building the relationship to the point where an ask is appropriate. Activities include private tours, lunches with the executive director, invitations to insider events, briefings on programs the prospect cares about, and progressively deeper involvement (advisory committee, site visits, peer engagement).

The mistake here is performative cultivation — generic newsletters and donor events that don’t move the relationship forward. Real cultivation is specific to the prospect’s interests and signals progressively deeper trust.

Solicitation

The ask. A specific amount, for a specific purpose, on a specific timeline. Solicitation is rarely a single meeting — it usually involves a pre-ask conversation to test the amount, the formal ask itself, and one or more follow-up conversations to handle questions and refine the gift agreement.

Stewardship

After the gift is made, stewardship begins. Stewardship is itself the start of cultivation for the next gift. Reports on impact, recognition appropriate to the gift size, and continued personal contact are all stewardship moves. The donor stewardship plan guide covers the structure.

Portfolio Sizing

The portfolio is the set of prospects assigned to a given officer. Size matters: too small and the officer is under-utilized; too large and prospects don’t get the attention required to advance.

The standard target for a full-time major gift officer is 120–150 active prospects. “Active” excludes prospects in pure stewardship (post-gift hold) and prospects formally deferred. Of the 120–150:

  • 25–40 in active solicitation (asks pending or being prepared)
  • 50–70 in cultivation (substantive moves on cadence)
  • 20–30 in qualification (assessment in progress)
  • 10–20 in identification (newly assigned, awaiting first contact)

If your officer has 250+ prospects, half of them are getting nothing. Pruning the portfolio is more useful than adding more prospects.

The Cadence Rule

The single most important operational discipline: every prospect has a documented next move and date. No exceptions. A prospect with no scheduled next move is by definition stalled, even if the officer thinks they’re “warm.”

The default cadence by stage:

  • Identification: first contact within 30 days of assignment
  • Qualification: discovery visit within 60 days
  • Cultivation: substantive move every 60–90 days
  • Solicitation: weekly contact during active ask preparation
  • Stewardship: at minimum, quarterly contact in year one post-gift

These are floors, not ceilings. The cadence on a $1M prospect is much higher than a $25K prospect. But every prospect has a next move and date, always.

What Counts as a “Move”

Not every email or holiday card is a move. A move is a substantive interaction that meaningfully advances the relationship or surfaces new information about the prospect. Examples:

  • Discovery or strategy visit (in person or video)
  • Private tour or site visit
  • Briefing meeting on a program of interest
  • Substantive phone call (not a quick check-in)
  • Hand-written letter on a specific topic
  • Personal introduction to a board member, executive, or program leader
  • Cultivation event with documented follow-up

A generic newsletter, a routine acknowledgment letter, or a “happy holidays” email is not a move. Logging non-moves as moves degrades the data and creates the illusion of activity.

Reporting That Surfaces Stuck Prospects

Pipeline value and total dollars raised are lagging indicators — by the time they move, the work is done. The leading indicators are:

Substantive Moves Per Officer Per Month

A productive officer logs 25–40 substantive moves per month across the portfolio. Below 20 and the portfolio is going stale; above 50 and you’re probably logging non-moves.

Portfolio Velocity

The number of prospects who advanced a stage during the reporting period. A healthy program shows steady stage progression; a stuck program shows prospects piling up in cultivation indefinitely.

Pipeline Value

The sum of expected gift amounts weighted by probability of close. Standard probability bands: identification 5%, qualification 20%, cultivation 40%, solicitation 70%, gift agreement 90%. Weighted pipeline is the closest leading indicator of next-12-months major gift revenue.

Stuck Prospects

Any prospect with no logged move in 90+ days. These should appear on a weekly report and be either re-activated, transferred, or formally deferred. Letting them sit is the most common reason major gift programs underperform.

Common Failures

The four patterns that derail moves management programs:

  1. No portfolio assignment. Without a single owner per prospect, accountability vanishes.
  2. Cadence theater. Logging every email as a move inflates activity numbers and hides actual stagnation.
  3. No qualification discipline. Officers carry 200+ prospects, most of whom are unqualified. Pruning aggressively is healthier than adding.
  4. Solicitation without cultivation. Asking too early with insufficient relationship is the most common reason for declined gifts.

The case for support guide covers the messaging foundation that makes solicitations land.

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the right portfolio size for a major gift officer?

120–150 active prospects for a full-time officer. Below 100 is under-utilization; above 175 is unsustainable.

How long does cultivation typically last?

12–18 months for five-figure asks, 2–3 years for six-figure, 3–5 years for seven-figure principal gifts.

How do you decide when to move from cultivation to solicitation?

Three signals: specific program interest, credible read on gift range, donor openness to a substantive giving conversation. Missing any signal means more cultivation.

Which metrics matter most?

Substantive moves per month, portfolio velocity, weighted pipeline value, and stuck-prospect count. Total raised is a lagging indicator.

Should board members be in the system?

Yes — those who are donors/prospects belong in the prospect track. Those who help cultivate others are tracked as solicitors against specific prospect records.

What’s a substantive move?

An interaction that advances the relationship or surfaces new information. Discovery visits, tours, strategy meetings, substantive calls, personal introductions. Generic touchpoints don’t count.

Free resource

Get the Nonprofit Grant Compliance Checklist

A practical checklist for post-award grant compliance: restricted funds, reporting cadence, audit prep, and common failure points. Delivered by email.

We'll email the resource and a short follow-up sequence. Unsubscribe any time.

Email is required because the download link is delivered by email, not on-page.

Frequently asked

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the right portfolio size for a major gift officer?
120–150 active prospects is the standard portfolio target for a full-time major gift officer. Below 100 and you're under-utilized; above 175 and prospects start falling through the cracks. The number assumes you're spending 60 percent of your time on portfolio activity.
How long does the cultivation stage typically last?
Twelve to eighteen months is normal for a five-figure ask, two to three years for a six-figure ask, three to five years for seven-figure or principal gifts. Compressing these timelines through pressure rarely accelerates the close — it usually kills the relationship.
What's the difference between qualification and cultivation?
Qualification is determining whether the prospect has capacity, inclination, and access — typically through wealth screening plus a discovery visit. Cultivation is the relationship-building work that comes after qualification confirms a prospect is worth investing in.
How do you know when to move a prospect from cultivation to solicitation?
Three signals: the prospect has expressed specific interest in a fundable program, you have a credible read on their likely gift range, and they've signaled openness to a substantive conversation about giving. Missing any one means more cultivation, not a premature ask.
What metrics matter most in moves management reporting?
Number of substantive moves per officer per month, portfolio velocity (prospects advancing stages), pipeline value (sum of expected gift amounts weighted by probability), and stuck prospects (no move in 90+ days). Total dollars raised is a lagging indicator.
Should board members be in the moves management system?
Board members who are donors and prospects should be in the system as prospects. Board members who help cultivate other prospects (host events, make introductions) are tracked as solicitors or volunteers in the relationship to specific prospects, not as separate prospects.